When Love Perceives


By Jean Tinder

“O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?”

I grew up with those words from 1 Corinthians 15, King James Version of course. They were part of a story I knew well: Humanity had fallen into sin, sin brought death, and Jesus came to solve the problem. Through his perfect life, sacrificial death, and supernatural resurrection, the debt was paid and death was conquered. Well, eventually anyway. Someday. If we get things right and make it to heaven.

But I’ve always had trouble with the accounting. It’s too transactional. How can 33 years of one perfect life balance out billions of tragically sinful lives? More importantly, if God truly forgives us, why does somebody else still have to pay? When I forgive a debt, I don’t find someone else with enough money to cover it. I erase the debt. 

So… if Yeshua’s remarkable lifetime wasn’t to satisfy a legal transaction, what was it about? 

A few days ago, I indulged in a 4-day camping trip in Rocky Mountain National Park. Between the grand vistas, bugling elk, tumbling streams and glowing aspens, nature was at her finest. 

One afternoon, I sat in the forest, enjoying one of those quiet moments when nothing particularly profound is happening. I felt the stillness of the trees, the warmth of the sun after the rain, the simple pleasure of being in my body, present in life. And I loved it, every bit of it. 

Not because my life is always wonderful; there are plenty of aches and annoyances, issues and uncertainties. It was all wonderful because I loved it.

Then, as my mind settled, some of the really big questions wandered in. I started pondering life, death, Yeshua, and love. 

Curiosity about death was actually one of the first things that led me beyond the religion of my childhood. I’ve read about near-death and out-of-body experiences, explored other perspectives, and experienced enough anomalies of my own to know that the standard explanations of reality leave out quite a lot. And over the years, a desire has steadily grown to somehow prove that death is not what we think it is. I mean, imagine what could happen if humanity’s greatest fear simply dissolved! How might the world change if someone actually showed up again after dying?

Wait… 

I think that’s already been done. Unfortunately, it was completely misunderstood. 

But that doesn’t mean it’s the end of the story…

Adamus has discussed this too, alluding to the possibility of leaving the planet and later returning without going through the usual birth-and-childhood routine; something about taking our biology with us and then re-manifesting as desired. Which, again, sounds kind of familiar.

Sitting there in the forest, I pondered the possibilities: Could I someday leave this life, and then bring the human expression of myself back into physical reality just to prove I still exist? How might that actually work?

Then a realization dawned. If I dislike my body, resent its limitations, judge my appearance, regret my choices, and generally don’t much like being human, why on earth would I do it again? More to the point, how could I possibly bring something back that I’d just spent a lifetime rejecting? Doesn’t really seem plausible.

But wait… what if I loved her? I mean really loved my human self completely? 

What possibilities would that bring?

In that moment, something vast and deep gently opened up in me, and I am still trying to gather the feelings into words. 

Love

In Love 2.0, Adamus defines love as “awareness and acceptance.” 

Can I love my human self – this body, personality, quirks, scars and wrinkles, wisdom, foolishness and all – so completely that nothing is rejected? 

Can I love my human life so deeply that nothing about it needs to be fixed – not because I finally got everything how I want it, but because I love it as it is?

The question was no longer just about coming back after death. Now it was also about love, so I followed the sparkling thread that seemed to connect them. 

Everybody knows Yeshua taught love. But rather than being merely one of his teachings, what if love was the fundamental thing? 

In a world steeped in tribalism, hierarchy, punishment and rigid ideas about righteousness, here was someone talking about loving your enemies, forgiving endlessly, caring for the rejected, responding to cruelty with grace, and finding the divine within. No wonder he was seen as a radical. And when humanity finally did its worst to him, he still did not reject anything or anyone. He simply remained what he was… love embodied. 

That was the seed we planted as the Yeshua Collective. But, because the fruit rarely resembles the seed, it took 2,000 years and a lot of unhappy detours to finally get to this time of harvest. Now love becomes real, and it changes everything.

Perception

The next day we went on a long hike, and my feet began to hurt. One in particular was complaining loudly because I’d forgotten to put a supportive pad in my boot. Limping along with miles still to go, I decided to explore this love stuff.

The first impulse was familiar: Give my foot some love, and maybe it would feel better. But right away I knew that wasn’t it. This deeper sense of love I’d glimpsed wasn’t just another way to fix stuff I don’t like. 

Instead of directing love toward my foot, I shifted toward perceiving it as love. Not pretending the pain wasn’t there or trying to transform it. Just… how does love itself perceive my foot? 

I felt a gentle, very subtle shift. My foot still hurt, but within me there was a kind of warmth, an opening, a softening that’s difficult to describe. The pain became something I was experiencing rather than something that was wrong. It took its place among everything else along the trail – beautiful flowers, dead trees, rocks, sunlight, aching feet – nothing excluded. 

Something had shifted, and the rest of the hike became a sort of laboratory. Trash beside the trail triggered judgment; squabbling hikers triggered scrutiny and blame. And each was an opportunity to ask: How does love perceive this?

That evening, our campsite neighbors were talking and laughing while I was trying to sleep. Tents offer little sound dampening, and I had plenty of ideas about what they should be doing differently. Back to the experiment… can I perceive the noise as love perceives? 

That one was harder. I wobbled a bit, but I stuck with it. The annoyance didn’t magically disappear, and the neighbors didn’t quiet down until it started raining. But each time I shifted into love’s perception, something happened within me. 

The object of my perception wasn’t changing. The perceiver was.

I wasn’t trying to become a more loving person or remind myself to be kind, tolerant, spiritual, and accepting. I wasn’t even “sending love” to the noisy neighbors. In those brief moments, it felt more like Jean was getting out of the way and allowing love itself to be the perceiver. 

The next morning, I woke up with a question:

What happens when nothing is excluded from love’s perception? 

What happens when consciousness no longer perceives its own reality through separation?

Miracles

Suddenly, Yeshua’s life took on new meaning. He healed people, manifested food, apparently walked on water, and ultimately reappeared after his own death. We call these miracles because they don’t fit our understanding of how reality works. But maybe he actually understood the rules of reality.

What if he knew that love – not as emotion or virtue, but as awareness and acceptance without separation – changes the relationship between consciousness and its own energy?

If matter is my energy responding to consciousness, what happens to physical reality when that relationship is utterly without separation?

I don’t know yet, but I’m very curious.

My foot didn’t instantly heal, but it’s better now; the trash didn’t vanish until I picked it up; the neighbors kept making noise, at least until I fell asleep. But something changed within me every time I perceived as love. And maybe that’s where the experiment takes us now – not manipulating reality but allowing the separation to fade.

What happens when nothing in my experience is outside love’s perception? 

Resurrection

Which brings me back to the biggest human limitation of all – death. In this reality, bodies age, fail, and die. That particular rule seems pretty well established, which is why Yeshua’s story has been so compelling for two thousand years. (See? Coming back from the dead kind of rocked the world!) But what if his resurrection wasn’t a divine exception to the rules of this world? What if it was actually another demonstration of love?

Maybe Yeshua’s resurrection – or re-manifestation, if you prefer – happened not because he paid some cosmic invoice, but because there was simply no rejection or separation within him. Even after betrayal, suffering, humiliation, and death, nothing and no one was rejected.

There. Was. Only. Love. 

And if consciousness, as love, knows no separation within itself, how could death possibly contain it?

I don’t know (yet) if that is literally how resurrection works, and I have yet to find a handy re-materialization manual tucked away somewhere. But sitting beside that creek, I peered into a love so deep that it felt like the last 2,000 years tumbled into it and somehow emerged as the greatest treasure I could possibly imagine.

To be clear, I’m not talking about love as sentimentality or positive thinking, love “applied” as a solution, or even love as something to give to myself or another. I’m talking about a love so complete that nothing is excluded from its perception. 

Can I allow that kind of love into every part of my human experience? Because that feels more important than whether I can someday reappear after my funeral. In fact, maybe resurrection begins long before death. Every time I stop rejecting a part of myself, something comes home. Every time I release judgment of this body, this history, this human journey, another separation ends. Maybe resurrection isn’t so much about coming back from death but about discovering how completely alive I already am. 

Love’s Perception

“Love is awareness and acceptance,” Adamus says, which sounds to me like inclusion – nothing outside, nothing rejected, nothing required to change before it can belong. I’ve often thought of love as the best lens through which to perceive reality. But now even that feels like separation – me looking through a lens at something else. 

But what if Love perceives as me?

Can I allow Love itself to behold life through these eyes? 

Maybe that is what Yeshua was expressing all along: not a formula for escaping divine judgment or a set of lessons to follow, but divine love embodied in human form. 

Maybe his miracles weren’t proof that he was different from us, but glimpses of what is possible when consciousness no longer perceives its own reality through separation.

Yeshua was a team effort. We all contributed to that expression, that essence, that embodiment of love. Now it comes home. And suddenly that old scripture sounds different. “O death, where is thy sting? O grave, where is thy victory?” 

Maybe death was never the problem. Maybe the problem was separation. And the key has been here for a few thousand years – Love. 

Not something to practice, earn, or even give, but simply What I Am.

God also. Here.

Being Love’s perception.

Author

  • As Crimson Circle’s Content Manager, Jean is fulfilling her life-long dream to shine light in the world. On a spiritual journey since childhood, she found Crimson Circle in 2002, joined the staff in 2008 and never looked back. Her first book is called “Stories from My Last Lifetime”. She can be contacted via email.

    View all posts
<>14 /19

8 thoughts on “SHAUMBRA HEARTBEAT – WHEN LOVE PERCEIVES”

  1. Beautiful reminder, this pointer that Love is a sense, as Adamus revealed vears ago. And life and foot ache can be perceived through this sense also, not only through eyes, ears, touch etc. Thank you for your very practical wisdom, Jean !

  2. Within spiritual communities, there is this sense that we should just love everyone no matter what they do. Instantly forgive. I get it. We are all children of God, forever in grace.

    And what if things like not loving something are also love? What if not forgiving someone is also love? What if Yeshua had refused to fall victim to humans in the first place? What if, rather than allowing them to torture and kill him, he had simply said no and chosen himself? What might humanity have learned from an example of love that did not require self-sacrifice?

    Has his end really taught humanity anything other than to continue to abuse his image and distort what it meant, so they can rely on him like some kind of Santa Claus of divine wishes?

    What if love is being excommunicated from a group for being a rapist and refusing to change? In the same way that, in Keahak 3, the final session, Adamus guided us to command the aspects to either integrate or be lost forever and excommunicated.

    What if love is also saying, “I don’t love that part of me, and I’m not going to lie to myself that I do. But I’m going to accept it without resistance”?

    What if love is simply being honest and clear?

    How many bad marriages would have ended earlier? How many unhealthy relationships would never have continued for years? How much suffering might we have avoided if we weren’t afraid to recognise the shadow expressions of love as love too, without pretending that we have to love everything?

    Maybe love isn’t always saying yes.

    Maybe sometimes love is having the grace to say no. Get out or come back when you’re truely ready?

    There’s no one answer.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top